America’s largest banking groups said Monday that the CLARITY Act’s proposed language on stablecoin yield still fails to adequately protect bank deposits, despite acknowledging that lawmakers are seeking the correct policy goal. The dispute threatens to stall the bipartisan bill ahead of the November 2026 midterm elections.
Bankers Push for Stronger Yield Prohibition
The American Bankers Association, alongside the Bank Policy Institute, Consumer Bankers Association, Financial Services Forum, and Independent Community Bankers of America, issued a joint statement criticizing Section 404 of the CLARITY Act. They argued that the current text creates a loophole allowing crypto platforms to pay interest-like rewards on stablecoins outside traditional banking regulations.
Also read: Ethics standoff threatens Senate progress on CLARITY Act crypto bill ahead of Thursday markup
“This is a significant loophole that must be addressed,” the groups said, adding they would share detailed suggestions with lawmakers in the coming days. The bankers cited research by economist Andrew Nigrinis suggesting stablecoin yields could reduce consumer, small-business, and farm loans by one-fifth or more if deposit outflows accelerate.
Bipartisan Compromise or Stalemate?
Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, defended the current text as a necessary compromise. He noted the bill prohibits stablecoin rewards on idle balances while allowing crypto platforms to offer other forms of customer rewards. “Most importantly, it helps put us on a bipartisan path to pass the CLARITY Act,” Tillis said, adding that some in the banking industry may not want innovation to happen.
Also read: Circle stock surges 15% after strong earnings, $222M ARC token presale fuels stablecoin optimism
The CLARITY Act passed the House in July 2025 by a 294-134 vote but has since stalled in the Senate over the stablecoin yield dispute. Coinbase and other crypto industry advocates are pushing for a Senate markup as early as next week.
White House Analysis Challenges Bank Concerns
White House economists reported in April that banning stablecoin yield would increase bank lending by only $2.1 billion, a marginal net increase of about 0.02%. This directly contradicts the banking sector’s warnings of significant credit contraction. The divergence highlights the deep policy rift between traditional finance and the crypto industry.
What’s at Stake for Readers
The outcome of the CLARITY Act debate will determine how stablecoins are regulated in the United States, potentially affecting millions of users and billions in digital asset markets. If the bill fails to pass before the midterms, regulatory uncertainty could persist for years, impacting innovation, consumer protections, and the stability of the broader financial system.
Conclusion
The CLARITY Act remains at a critical juncture as US banks and crypto advocates clash over stablecoin yield rules. While lawmakers seek a bipartisan path forward, the banking industry’s insistence on tighter restrictions may delay or derail the legislation. The coming weeks will be decisive for the bill’s fate and the future of stablecoin regulation in America.
FAQs
Q1: What is the CLARITY Act?
The CLARITY Act is a bipartisan US bill that aims to create a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, including rules on issuance, reserves, and consumer protections.
Q2: Why do US banks oppose the current stablecoin yield language?
Banks argue that the proposed language allows crypto platforms to offer yield-like rewards on stablecoins, potentially drawing deposits away from traditional banks and reducing their ability to lend.
Q3: When could the CLARITY Act be voted on?
Senate markup could occur as early as next week, but the bill faces an uncertain timeline due to disagreements over stablecoin yield and the approaching November 2026 midterm elections.
Be the first to comment