Why Ether price keeps stalling at $2,400: DApps revenue drop, institutional caution, and fierce competition

Ether price barrier at $2,400 with stunted growth symbolizing stalled rallies

Ether (ETH) has repeatedly failed to sustain levels above $2,400 over the past three months, lagging behind most of its peers in a market that has otherwise shown signs of recovery. The cryptocurrency is down 21% year-to-date in 2026, and on-chain data suggests specific structural headwinds are preventing a sustained breakout.

Sharp decline in DApps activity weighs on ETH

Decentralized exchange (DEX) volumes on Ethereum have fallen by 53% over the past six months, according to data from DefiLlama. This decline has directly impacted decentralized application (DApp) revenue, which dropped 49% in the same period. The slump in memecoin trading and a broader slowdown in new token launches have reduced the appeal of Ethereum’s DEX ecosystem.

Also read: Bermuda to move key financial services onto Stellar blockchain, premier says

April 2026 saw the cryptocurrency industry suffer $630 million in hacks, with KelpDAO and Drift Protocol accounting for 82% of the losses. Blockchain security firm Hacken attributed these attacks to actors linked to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). Such security incidents further dampened user confidence and DApp activity across the board.

Competitors gain ground in DApp revenue

While Ethereum remains the absolute leader in total value locked (TVL), its competitors are capturing a growing share of DApp revenue. Solana and Hyperliquid now account for a combined 42% market share in DApp revenue, a notable figure given that Ethereum’s TVL is six times larger. These networks have prioritized base-layer scalability, offering users less friction and lower fees.

Also read: Senate CLARITY Act markup faces ethics debate as North Korea crypto thefts hit $2B and Bitmine slows Ether buys

Uttam Singh, an engineer at Alchemy, noted that some market participants have incorrectly judged Ethereum’s upcoming Glamstedam hard fork as a threat to layer-2 rollups. In reality, the upgrade is expected to triple base-layer capacity and allow clients to pre-fetch block data, enabling parallel transaction execution. However, the complexity of these changes leaves many users and investors uncertain about whether they will ultimately generate higher network fees or staking yields.

Institutional interest under pressure

Institutional perception of Ether has also been negatively impacted. Bitmine (BMNR US), the largest publicly listed holder of ETH, remains underwater on its corporate reserves. The company, led by chairman Tom Lee, spent $12.2 billion to acquire ETH, but its position is currently valued at $10.8 billion. While this does not pose an immediate sell-off risk, it reduces the asset’s institutional appeal and signals caution among large holders.

Conclusion

None of these factors are absolute barriers to Ether reaching $2,800 or higher. However, the combination of declining on-chain activity, fierce competition in the DApps sector, and reduced institutional confidence continues to cap price rallies near $2,400. Until these headwinds show clear signs of reversal, Ether is likely to remain an underperformer relative to the broader cryptocurrency market.

FAQs

Q1: Why is Ether price stuck below $2,400?
Ether is facing multiple headwinds: a 53% drop in DEX volumes, 49% decline in DApp revenue, fierce competition from Solana and Hyperliquid, and reduced institutional interest due to large holders like Bitmine sitting on unrealized losses.

Q2: Will Ethereum’s Glamstedam hard fork help ETH price?
The upgrade is expected to triple base-layer capacity and improve scalability, but its impact on network fees and staking yields remains uncertain. Investors are waiting for tangible results before pricing in a positive effect.

Q3: Is institutional interest in Ether declining?
Data suggests caution among institutional holders. Bitmine, the largest publicly listed ETH holder, has $1.4 billion in unrealized losses on its position, which reduces the asset’s appeal to risk-averse institutional investors.

Jackson Miller

Written by

Jackson Miller

Jackson Miller is a senior cryptocurrency journalist and market analyst with over eight years of experience covering digital assets, blockchain technology, and decentralized finance. Before joining CoinPulseHQ as lead writer, Jackson worked as a financial technology correspondent for several business publications where he developed deep expertise in derivatives markets, on-chain analytics, and institutional crypto adoption. At CoinPulseHQ, Jackson covers Bitcoin price movements, Ethereum ecosystem developments, and emerging Layer-2 protocols.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*