Groundbreaking Crypto Law: South Korea Proposes Mandatory Disclosure of Influencer Holdings

Seoul, South Korea – March 2025: In a significant move to regulate the intersection of social media and finance, South Korea’s ruling party has introduced a groundbreaking legislative proposal. The new law would mandate that financial influencers, known as ‘finfluencers,’ publicly disclose their personal cryptocurrency holdings and any promotional compensation received. This initiative marks a pivotal step in the nation’s ongoing efforts to establish a transparent and secure digital asset ecosystem, directly responding to growing concerns over undisclosed conflicts of interest in online financial advice.

South Korea’s Proposed Crypto Law Targets Finfluencer Transparency

The proposed legislation, formally introduced by members of the ruling People Power Party, specifically targets individuals who provide financial information, analysis, or investment advice related to virtual assets through social media platforms, video channels, or blogs. Under the new rules, these influencers would be required to make regular disclosures about the size and nature of their personal cryptocurrency portfolios. Furthermore, any payment, whether in fiat currency or digital assets, received for promoting a specific cryptocurrency project, exchange, or token must be clearly and conspicuously declared in their content. The law aims to close a regulatory gap where traditional financial advertisement rules have struggled to keep pace with the decentralized and rapidly evolving crypto market. Authorities argue that such transparency is essential for retail investors to distinguish between genuine educational content and paid promotional material, thereby making more informed decisions.

The Global Context of Financial Influencer Regulation

South Korea’s proposal places it at the forefront of a global regulatory trend, though its approach is notably stringent. Other jurisdictions have taken varied steps to address similar concerns.

• United States: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has enforced existing securities laws, charging influencers for failing to disclose payments for touting securities, including certain cryptocurrencies deemed as such.
• United Kingdom: The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) mandates that financial promotions, including those by influencers, must be clear, fair, and not misleading, often requiring explicit ‘#ad’ designations for paid promotions.
• Australia: The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has published specific guidelines warning influencers that providing financial advice without a license—including crypto advice—is illegal.

Unlike these measures, which often focus on promotional disclosures or licensing, South Korea’s bill uniquely compels the disclosure of personal asset holdings. This creates a direct window into an influencer’s personal stake in the assets they discuss, a move proponents believe is crucial for assessing potential bias.

Historical Precedent: South Korea’s Evolving Crypto Framework

This bill is not an isolated action but the latest development in South Korea’s multi-year journey to regulate the cryptocurrency sector. The nation has been a global hotspot for crypto trading since the mid-2010s. In response to market volatility and fraud scandals, the government implemented the Specific Financial Information Act in 2021, which required all cryptocurrency exchanges to register with financial authorities, implement real-name bank account verification, and report suspicious transactions. The 2022 collapse of the Terra-Luna ecosystem, founded by Korean entrepreneur Do Kwon, further accelerated regulatory scrutiny. The new finfluencer law represents a logical extension of this regulatory philosophy—shifting focus from just exchanges and issuers to the information channels that significantly shape public perception and investment behavior.

Potential Impact and Industry Reaction

The proposed law has sparked a complex debate within South Korea’s vibrant tech and finance communities. Proponents, including investor advocacy groups and traditional financial regulators, hail it as a necessary shield for retail investors. They argue that undisclosed promotions have led to ‘pump-and-dump’ schemes and significant losses for inexperienced traders who trust popular online figures. Conversely, many influencers and content creators within the crypto space express concern. They warn that forced disclosure of holdings could make them targets for theft, harassment, or market manipulation by larger players who could trade against their revealed positions. Some also question the logistical challenge of defining who qualifies as a ‘finfluencer’ and how frequently disclosures must be updated in a 24/7 market. Legal experts anticipate a period of rigorous debate in the National Assembly, with potential amendments to address privacy and operational concerns before any final vote.

Conclusion

South Korea’s proposal to mandate crypto holdings disclosure for influencers represents a bold and pioneering attempt to foster accountability in the digital age of finance. By targeting the critical link between information and investment, the law seeks to build a more transparent and trustworthy environment for the nation’s millions of crypto participants. Its progression through parliament will be closely watched by regulators, industry participants, and influencers worldwide, as it may set a new global benchmark for how societies manage the powerful influence of social media on financial markets. The final form and implementation of this South Korea crypto law will significantly shape the future landscape of financial communication and investor protection in one of the world’s most active cryptocurrency economies.

FAQs

Q1: What exactly would South Korea’s new law require influencers to do?
The proposed law would require individuals deemed ‘financial influencers’ to publicly disclose their personal cryptocurrency investment holdings and any compensation they receive for promoting specific crypto projects or services in their content.

Q2: Who would be considered a ‘finfluencer’ under this law?
While the final legal definition is pending, it broadly targets individuals who provide financial information, analysis, or investment advice related to virtual assets (cryptocurrencies) to the public via social media platforms, YouTube, blogs, or other online channels.

Q3: Why is South Korea introducing this law now?
This move is part of South Korea’s continued effort to regulate its active crypto market, increase investor protection, and prevent market manipulation following past incidents like the Terra-Luna collapse. It addresses the growing power of social media in driving investment decisions.

Q4: How does this compare to regulations in other countries?
While the US, UK, and Australia have rules about disclosing paid promotions or requiring licenses for financial advice, South Korea’s proposal is unique in its specific mandate for disclosing the influencer’s own crypto asset holdings, not just promotional relationships.

Q5: What are the main criticisms of the proposed law?
Critics argue that forced disclosure of personal holdings could make influencers targets for hackers, invade their financial privacy, and be difficult to implement fairly. They also worry it could stifle legitimate financial education and discussion online.

Related: Bitcoin Fundamental Value Hits $47,516 – What the CVDD Metric Reveals About BTC’s 2026 Floor

Related: Essential Guide: Binance Alpha Launches Crucial LYN Airdrop – 256 Points Required

Related: Crypto Market Crash: 6 Critical Reasons Behind February 2026's Devastating Plunge