Agora CEO Slams Anchorage Report as Biased in Explosive Stablecoin Safety Debate

Agora CEO challenges Anchorage's stablecoin safety report on AUSD

The cryptocurrency world is buzzing after Agora CEO Nick van Eck publicly dismissed Anchorage Digital’s stablecoin safety report as biased. The explosive claims center around AUSD’s low rating and raise serious questions about transparency in crypto asset evaluations.

Why is Agora challenging the Anchorage stablecoin report?

According to The Block, van Eck argues that Anchorage’s decision to delist AUSD and USDC wasn’t based on legitimate security concerns, but rather on Agora’s refusal to join its “Genius Bill as a Service” program. The Agora CEO made several key points:

  • Anchorage cited structural risks for the delisting
  • Van Eck claims the real reason was commercial
  • Agora would have accepted a business-driven decision
  • The company objects to security claims masking business interests

How did Anchorage rate stablecoins in its controversial report?

Anchorage’s evaluation placed PayPal’s PYUSD and Paxos’s USDP at the top of its rankings, while AUSD landed near the bottom. The report examined several factors:

StablecoinRating
PYUSDHighest
USDPHighest
AUSDLowest

What does this mean for stablecoin safety standards?

The public dispute highlights growing concerns about:

  • Transparency in stablecoin evaluations
  • Potential conflicts of interest
  • The need for standardized rating criteria
  • How commercial relationships influence listings

FAQs About the Agora-Anchorage Stablecoin Controversy

What is AUSD?

AUSD is the stablecoin issued by Agora, designed to maintain 1:1 parity with the US dollar.

Why does the Anchorage report matter?

As a major institutional crypto platform, Anchorage’s evaluations carry significant weight in the industry.

What is the Genius Bill as a Service program?

Details are limited, but it appears to be a commercial offering from Anchorage that Agora declined to join.

How are stablecoins typically evaluated?

Common factors include reserves, redemption mechanisms, issuer transparency, and regulatory compliance.

What’s next in this dispute?

The crypto community awaits responses from both parties and potential impacts on stablecoin adoption.